Research and Development in Ontario

Both the Federal and Provincial governments have realized the importance of Research and Development ("R&D") in keeping Canada competitive with the rest of the world. In order to promote R&D in Canada, they have provided a variety of income tax incentives. However, in order to qualify for these government incentives, a complex set of criteria and guidelines must be met. These guidelines and the benefits of meeting these guidelines are briefly described in the following article.

The Benefit of R&D

The following deductions and incentives are available to corporations that carry on qualifying R&D in Ontario.

Investment Tax Credits ("ITC")

Qualifying Canadian Controlled Corporations ("CCPC's"") are entitled to a 35% ITC on current R&D expenditures. The ITC can be applied against federal taxes payable in that year or refunded to the claimant in most cases. Other corporations that do not qualify as CCPC's, are entitled to a 20% ITC with no refundability provision.

Proxy Election

The proxy election adds a notional overhead amount of 65% of the qualifying R&D salaries and wages to the expenditure amount eligible for ITC's.

Ontario Superallowance

Ontario provides a special deduction from Ontario income for qualifying R&D expenditures, varying from 25% - 52.5% of the expense.

Effective February 29, 2000, this deduction has been eliminated. Instead, the Ontario government will not tax the prior years Federal ITC that must be added back to income for Federal purposes.

Ontario Innovation Tax Credit ("OITC")

The OITC is a 10% refundable tax credit for eligible R&D expenditures incurred in Ontario. The OITC is available to corporations with taxable income of less than $200,000 and taxable paid-up capital of less than $25,000,000.

Eligible R&D Work

Revenue Canada has published a lengthy guideline known as Information Circular 86-4R3 which sets forth their interpretation of the R&D rules. Although it is extremely lengthy and complex, any company considering claiming R&D credits should read through the circular.

Although each corporation must be individually analyzed to determine whether they may qualify for R&D, there are three basic criteria that must be met before further investigation is warranted. The three basic criteria that must be met are as follows:

(1) Scientific or technological advancement

(2) Scientific or technological uncertainty

(3) Scientific or technological content

Scientific or Technological Advancement

A project must embody scientific or technological advancement through the generation of new knowledge or information which advances our understanding of scientific relations or technologies.

In essence, this means that the advancement can be measured. The product must be faster, better or cheaper. It is important that an advancement is measured from a standard practice. The company must identify the standard practice and go beyond that practice.

The company must document this departure from standard practice. Thus the researcher should document that he is trying to develop something two times faster or twice as dense etc.

Scientific or Technological Uncertainty

A project must also show that it involves scientific or technological uncertainty whose resolution has been attempted or achieved, usually through a combination of analysis and experiment and a systematic approach.

Technological uncertainty not only means situations where it is uncertain whether goals can be achieved at all, but also encompasses situations where the corporation may be confident that the goals can be achieved, but may be uncertain which of the several alternatives (ie: paths, routes, approaches, equipment configurations etc.) will either work at all, or be feasible in order to meet desired specifications and/or cost targets.

It is extremely important that a company documents the uncertainty of a project prior to its initiation, so that Revenue Canada can be satisfied that a project that has achieved its goals had uncertainty at the outset.

Scientific or Technological Content

The final criteria embodies scientific and technical content, which means the activity must reflect a systematic process of hypothesis formulation, analysis, and/or experiment. It must also be shown that the work was performed by competent persons who have relevant experience in science, technology, or the related disciplines appropriate to the field of endeavour.

Essentially Revenue Canada is asking that the researchers keep a lab record of what has been done.

Documentation

As noted several times above, documentation is as important to the process as the research itself. A project worksheet and employee timesheets should be completed for each project.


The above discussion is general in nature and is not intended
to provide income tax advice.
Copyright © 2011 Kiel & Company. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Statement.